Re: [patch] pciehp: dont call pci_enable_dev

[Kristen Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>]

On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 17:52 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 15:00 -0700, Kristen Accardi wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 08:16 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 15:50 -0700, Kristen Accardi wrote:
> > > > Don't call pci_enable_device from pciehp because the pcie port service driver
> > > > already does this.
> > > 
> > > hmmmm shouldn't pci_enable_device on a previously enabled device just
> > > succeed? Sounds more than logical to me to make it that way at least...
> > 
> > I can't think of any reason why not.  Something like this what you had
> > in mind perhaps?
> > 
> > ---
> 
> the question then becomes if enable/disable should become "counting", eg
> enable twice disable once leaves enabled at count one....

ugh, no.  1) I think we should avoid adding more counting unless it's
absolutely necessary. 2) if a device calls pci_disable_device it should
always actually disable the device, because it is generally called in
drivers either when the device is being shutdown, or suspended.

   
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/