Re: [patch] pciehp: dont call pci_enable_dev

On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 15:00 -0700, Kristen Accardi wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 08:16 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 15:50 -0700, Kristen Accardi wrote:
> > > Don't call pci_enable_device from pciehp because the pcie port service driver
> > > already does this.
> > 
> > hmmmm shouldn't pci_enable_device on a previously enabled device just
> > succeed? Sounds more than logical to me to make it that way at least...
> 
> I can't think of any reason why not.  Something like this what you had
> in mind perhaps?
> 
> ---

the question then becomes if enable/disable should become "counting", eg
enable twice disable once leaves enabled at count one....


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] pciehp: dont call pci_enable_dev
    • From: Kristen Accardi <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch] pciehp: dont call pci_enable_dev
    • From: Kristen Accardi <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] pciehp: dont call pci_enable_dev
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] pciehp: dont call pci_enable_dev
    • From: Kristen Accardi <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] serialize assign_irq_vector() use of static variables
• Next by Date: Re: pcmcia subsystem completely broken
• Previous by thread: Re: [Pcihpd-discuss] Re: [patch] pciehp: dont call pci_enable_dev
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] pciehp: dont call pci_enable_dev
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]