Re: C++ pushback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 

On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:22:32 +0200, Xavier Bestel <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> Yes, "if". With straight C, it's immediatly obvious the kmalloc() is the
> only function with side-effects and special requirements - an
> experienced hacker won't even look it up. With C++ those may be hidden
> behind each object or object member, that's the philosophy of the
> language. 
> The problem is that in kernel mode you must know precisely when and how
> you allocate memory.
> 

Don't mix allocation with initialization.
Well, lets see:

  struct xxx {
    struct yyy* y;
    int z;
  }
  
  xxx_init(struct xxx* x)
  {
     z = 0;
     y = kmalloc(GPF_KERNEL,sizeof(struct yyy));
     yyy_init(y);
  }

Now, if on other source file you read:
  ...
  struct xxx* x;
  x = kmallloc(GPF_KERNEL,sizeof(struct xxx));
  xxx_init(x);
  ..
  struct xxx  x2;
  xxx_init(&x2);

How do you know what xxx_init() does without looking at it ?
Cay you have just the allocation without init ? What happens if you forget it ?
What happens if you cut'n'paste from other driver and let something like

  struct xxx* x;
  x = kmallloc(GPF_KERNEL,sizeof(struct qqqqq));
  xxx_init(x);

The only difference it that
  x = new(GPF_KERNEL) XXX;

always does what it has to do correctly. What does XXX() constructor ?
You have to look at it, same as xxx_init().

As I said in other answer: I'm not advocating to include C++ support in
current kernel. I just say that the only valid argument is that
'KERNEL IS C', and interfacing C with C++ just would add bloat and errors.
There is no technical argument to reject to write an OS kernel in C++.
It would not be slower nor more complicated, and it will be probably safer
because it leaves less things (from thost you always _must_ do) to
programmers memories.

--
J.A. Magallon <jamagallon()able!es>     \               Software is like sex:
werewolf!able!es                         \         It's better when it's free
Mandriva Linux release 2006.1 (Cooker) for i586
Linux 2.6.16-jam9 (gcc 4.1.1 20060330 (prerelease)) #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux