Re: C++ pushback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Martin Mares wrote:
That seems to be a case against writing functions.

Why is a C function acceptable where a C++ constructor isn't?

Because examining a single constructor is not enough -- you need to
check constructors of all objects contained within the object you
initialize.

Calling a C function is simple and explicit -- a quick glance over
the code is enough to tell what gets called.

No, you need to check all the functions it calls as well.

But I agree that C is more explicit than C++.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux