On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 14:48:46 EDT, Stephen Smalley said: > On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 14:34 -0400, [email protected] wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:45:33 EDT, Stephen Smalley said: > > > > > pam_namespace in Fedora Core. Not to mention that the restrictions you > > > mention only solve the problem within the jail, which is fine if we are > > > only talking about jail mechanisms. Not so good for any kind of real > > > MAC. > > > > Umm.. Stephen? Where in Fedora Core is it? I'm running a Fedora Core Rawhide > > right now, and it's not on my system, and 'yum provides pam_namespace.so' > > doesn't find it either. There *is* stuff over in the -lspp branch, but it > > (AFAIK) hasn't escaped into anything resembling general availability. Was this > > what you were referencing? > > Today's rawhide. 0.99.3.0-3. ChangeLog is: > * Tue Apr 25 2006 Tomas Mraz <[email protected]> 0.99.3.0-3 > - added pam_namespace module written by Janak Desai (per-user /tmp > support) > - new pam-redhat modules version OK.. That one hasn't actually propagated out to where it's visible yet. :)
Attachment:
pgpGqJnQxPvMD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
- From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
- From: Stephen Smalley <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
- From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
- From: Stephen Smalley <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
- From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
- From: "Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
- From: Stephen Smalley <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
- From: "Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
- From: Stephen Smalley <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
- From: [email protected]
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
- From: Stephen Smalley <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.16.6 ( - 2.6.16.11 ) compile failure on an alpha
- Next by Date: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Digsig 1.5: kernel module for run-timeauthentication of binaries
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
- Index(es):
 |