On Tue, 2006-04-25 11:29:25 +0100, Brian Uhrain <[email protected]> wrote: > --- > arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c | 12 +++++++----- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > --- linux-2.6.16.11.orig/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c 2006-04-25 11:21:03.000000000 +0100 > +++ linux-2.6.16.11/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c 2006-04-25 11:22:56.557266608 +0100 > @@ -483,11 +483,13 @@ register_cpus(void) > { > int i; > > - for_each_possible_cpu(i) { > - struct cpu *p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL); > - if (!p) > - return -ENOMEM; > - register_cpu(p, i, NULL); > + for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) { Nope. Please implement for_each_possible_cpu(). A patch for that flew along right today. > + if (cpu_possible(i)) { > + struct cpu *p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!p) > + return -ENOMEM; > + register_cpu(p, i, NULL); > + } > } > return 0; > } MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw [email protected] . +49-172-7608481 _ O _ "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O für einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- 2.6.16.6 ( - 2.6.16.11 ) compile failure on an alpha
- From: [email protected] (Tomi Lapinlampi)
- Re: 2.6.16.6 ( - 2.6.16.11 ) compile failure on an alpha
- From: Brian Uhrain <[email protected]>
- 2.6.16.6 ( - 2.6.16.11 ) compile failure on an alpha
- Prev by Date: Re: Compiling C++ modules
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.16.6 ( - 2.6.16.11 ) compile failure on an alpha
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.16.6 ( - 2.6.16.11 ) compile failure on an alpha
- Index(es):