Re: Fw: Possible MTD bug in 2.6.15

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


> From: "Pekka Enberg" <[email protected]>
> On 4/19/06, Thiago Galesi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Ok, a couple of comments/questions
> >
> > 1 - Wouldn't it be better to map all flash, and leave the unneeded
> > part as read only?

In general, yes.  But this should either be enforced somewhere nicer
(ie, die gracefully) so the kernel doesn't panic later, or be allowed
as in my patch.

> > 2 - Please follow  Documentation/SubmittingPatches format for sending
> > patches (especially the signed-off part and sending patches inline)
> >
> > 3 - No C++ style comments, please
> 4 - Read Documentation/CodingStyle before resubmitting the patch.

My apologies, I will do so, and resubmit when the patch is ready :)

Jim Ramsay
"Me fail English?  That's unpossible!"
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux