On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Seth Arnold wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 07:05:08PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > Are confined processes always restricted from starting
> > non-confined processes?
>
> It is specified in policy via an unconstrained execution flag: 'ux'. Any
> unconfined children can of course do whatever they wish.
And the default is for the children to inherit the security
policy from the parent process, like in SELinux ?
How do apparmor and selinux differ in how they contain bad
things?
--
All Rights Reversed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
