On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 07:05:08PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > Are confined processes always restricted from starting > non-confined processes? It is specified in policy via an unconstrained execution flag: 'ux'. Any unconfined children can of course do whatever they wish.
Attachment:
pgpfF8PfeAE6Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/11] security: AppArmor - Core access controls
- From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/11] security: AppArmor - Core access controls
- References:
- [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
- From: Tony Jones <[email protected]>
- [RFC][PATCH 4/11] security: AppArmor - Core access controls
- From: Tony Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/11] security: AppArmor - Core access controls
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/11] security: AppArmor - Core access controls
- From: Crispin Cowan <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/11] security: AppArmor - Core access controls
- From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
- [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
- Next by Date: TOE info page
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/11] security: AppArmor - Core access controls
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/11] security: AppArmor - Core access controls
- Index(es):
 |