Eric W. Biederman wrote: >>Is it time to ask for the utsname namespace patch to be tried out >>in -mm? >> >> > >Can we please suggest a syscall interface? > > What was wrong with the method of the one I posted / extracted from the Linux-VServer project? I mean, apart from the baggage which I intend to remove for the next posting. The concept was - have a single syscall with versioned subcommands. We can throw all of the namespace syscalls in there. Sam. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- References:
- [RFC][PATCH 0/5] uts namespaces: Introduction
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- [RFC][PATCH 0/5] uts namespaces: Introduction
- Prev by Date: Re: [Devel] Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/7] Some basic vserver infrastructure
- Next by Date: Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- Index(es):
 |