Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack

Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]> writes:

> Serge,
>
> can we do nothing with sysctls at this moment, instead of commiting hacks?

Except that we modify a static table changing the uts behaviour in
proc_doutsstring isn't all that bad.

I'm just about to start on something more comprehensive, in
the sysctl case.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
    • From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC][PATCH 0/5] uts namespaces: Introduction
    • From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
  • [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
    • From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Strange ACPI bug after resume
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]