Quoting [email protected] ([email protected]):
> On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 02:40:25 EDT, Kyle Moffett said:
> > Perhaps the SELinux model should be extended to handle (dir-inode,
> > path-entry) pairs. For example, if I want to protect the /etc/shadow
> > file regardless of what tool is used to safely modify it, I would set
>
> Some of us think that the tools can protect /etc/shadow just fine on their
> own, and are concerned with rogue software that abuses /etc/shadow without
> bothering to safely modify it..
Can you rephrase this? I'm don't understand what you're saying...
My default response would have to be:
> own, and are concerned with rogue software that abuses /etc/shadow without
> bothering to safely modify it..
rogue software like vi?
thanks,
-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
