Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/19/06, David Lang <[email protected]> wrote:

> 2. I thought I heard Linus state recently that makeing something only work
> as a module was unacceptable, officially stateing that modules are
> required and monolithic kernels aren't allowed anymore doesn't sound
> reasonable.

It works fine with or without modules - it's just that if you don't
have the module then you have to supply the firmware for yourself.
It's just like any of the other MODULE_ tags.

Jon.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux