From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:33:19 +0100
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 01:03:24PM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > > fact for access control purposes is fundamentally flawed. We're not going
> > > to add helpers or exports for it, I'd rather remove the ability to build
> > > lsm hook clients modular completely.
> >
> > Or, better, remove LSM itself ;)
>
> Seriously that makes a lot of sense. All other modules people have come up
> with over the last years are irrelevant and/or broken by design.
I totally agree, let's get rid of LSM while we can.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
