>
> But for removing LSM entirely, I'm starting to like your patch. It's
> been a very long time and so far, only out-of-tree LSMs are present,
> with no public statements about getting them submitted into the main
> kernel tree. And, I think almost all of the out-of-tree modules already
> need other kernel patches to get their code working properly, so what's
> a few more hooks needed...
and if it really cripples the one real user of the API.. then it's
clearly a wrong thing and it should be fixed (by going away and going
direct instead).
As for your argument about the bickering... well... afaics most of the
people who originally in the game quietly went away once it was clear
that LSM exports were _GPL only .. or when their modules were reviewed
and shown to be architecturally broken.
Who's left today?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
