On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 02:12:35PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > That appears fine, but I call add_active_range() after a GRANULEROUNDUP and > GRANULEROUNDDOWN has taken place so that might be the problem, especially as > all those ranges are aligned on a 16MiB boundary. The following patch calls > add_active_range() before the rounding takes place. Can you try it out please? That's good. Now I see identical output before/after your patch for the generic (DISCONTIG=y) kernel: On node 0 totalpages: 259873 DMA zone: 128931 pages, LIFO batch:7 Normal zone: 130942 pages, LIFO batch:7 -Tony - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
- From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
- From: [email protected] (Mel Gorman)
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
- From: "Luck, Tony" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
- From: [email protected] (Mel Gorman)
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
- From: "Luck, Tony" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
- From: [email protected] (Mel Gorman)
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
- From: "Luck, Tony" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
- From: [email protected] (Mel Gorman)
- [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: fix mm_struct reference counting bugs in mm/oom_kill.c
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] [2/2] POWERPC: Lower threshold for DART enablement to 1GB, V2
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
- Index(es):
 |