Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2

> Double counted a hole here, then went downhill. Does the following fix
> it?

Yes, that boots.  What's more the counts of pages in DMA/Normal
zone match the kernel w/o your patches too.  So for tiger_defconfig
you've now exactly matched the old behaivour.

I'll try to test generic and sparse kernels later, but I have to
look at another issue now.

-Tony
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
  - From: [email protected] (Mel Gorman)

References:
- [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
  - From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
  - From: [email protected] (Mel Gorman)
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
  - From: "Luck, Tony" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
  - From: [email protected] (Mel Gorman)

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] [2/2] POWERPC: Lower threshold for DART enablement to 1GB, V2
Next by Date: [PATCH] tpm: tpm-new-12-sysfs-files-fix-fix-fix
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]