Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2

> Double counted a hole here, then went downhill. Does the following fix
> it?

Yes, that boots.  What's more the counts of pages in DMA/Normal
zone match the kernel w/o your patches too.  So for tiger_defconfig
you've now exactly matched the old behaivour.

I'll try to test generic and sparse kernels later, but I have to
look at another issue now.

-Tony
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
    • From: [email protected] (Mel Gorman)

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
    • From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
    • From: [email protected] (Mel Gorman)
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
    • From: "Luck, Tony" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
    • From: [email protected] (Mel Gorman)

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] [2/2] POWERPC: Lower threshold for DART enablement to 1GB, V2
• Next by Date: [PATCH] tpm: tpm-new-12-sysfs-files-fix-fix-fix
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]