Re: [PATCH] Use atomic ops for file_nr accounting, not spinlock+irq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Trond Myklebust <[email protected]> wrote:

> I've been updating the NFS git tree on a daily basis. I'm not going to
> begin pulling from the -mm tree, though.

The thing to which I refer is in Linus's tree but wasn't in yours this
morning.  Unfortunately, this means my patch has to be different, depending on
whose tree I'm using... although your tree has been updated since then, so the
difference seems to have gone away.

I don't mean to be critical of your efforts, but the requirement imposed by
Andrew that I have to base my tree on yours makes things a little tricky
sometimes:-/

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux