Re: [PATCH] Use atomic ops for file_nr accounting, not spinlock+irq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 19:19 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Trond Myklebust <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > I've been updating the NFS git tree on a daily basis. I'm not going to
> > begin pulling from the -mm tree, though.
> 
> The thing to which I refer is in Linus's tree but wasn't in yours this
> morning.  Unfortunately, this means my patch has to be different, depending on
> whose tree I'm using... although your tree has been updated since then, so the
> difference seems to have gone away.
> 
> I don't mean to be critical of your efforts, but the requirement imposed by
> Andrew that I have to base my tree on yours makes things a little tricky
> sometimes:-/

You can always pull from Linus too. There is nothing within git that
forces you to wait for me to pull in his changes.

Cheers,
  Trond

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux