Re: [PATCH 0/6] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner

On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 11:39:46AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:

> The patches have only been *compile tested* for ia64 with a flatmem
> configuration. At attempt was made to boot test on an ancient RS/6000
> but the vanilla kernel does not boot so I have to investigate there.

The good news: Compilation is clean on the ia64 config variants that
I usually build (all 10 of them).

The bad (or at least consistent) news: It doesn't boot on an Intel
Tiger either (oops at kmem_cache_alloc+0x41).

-Tony
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/6] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner
    • From: "Bob Picco" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/6] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner
    • From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/6] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner
    • From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] ext3 percpu counter fixes to suppport for ext3 unsigned long type free blocks counter
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC/PATCH] remove unneeded check in bcm43xx
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 4/6] Have x86_64 use add_active_range() and free_area_init_nodes
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/6] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]