On 4/7/06, Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 04:40:20PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On 3/27/06, Sergei Shtylylov <[email protected]> wrote:
> >...
> > > > .flags = IDEPCI_FLAG_FORCE_PDC,
> > >
> > > A late question: wasn't that IDEPCI_FLAG_FORCE_PDC flag there for the same
> > > purpose -- to bypass enablebits check? Wasn't it enough?
> >
> > It was for the same purpose but it wasn't enough,
> > now this flag can die...
>
> IOW, we want the patch below?
Yes. Could you please add my ACK and forward it to akpm?
> > Bartlomiej
>
> cu
> Adrian
>
>
> <-- snip -->
>
>
> This patch removes the obsolete IDEPCI_FLAG_FORCE_PDC.
>
> Noted by Sergei Shtylylov <[email protected]>
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
>
> ---
>
> drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_old.c | 2 --
> drivers/ide/setup-pci.c | 13 -------------
> include/linux/ide.h | 1 -
> 3 files changed, 16 deletions(-)
>
> --- linux-2.6.17-rc1-mm1-full/include/linux/ide.h.old 2006-04-07 00:51:49.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.17-rc1-mm1-full/include/linux/ide.h 2006-04-07 00:52:03.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1221,7 +1221,6 @@
> enum {
> /* Uses ISA control ports not PCI ones. */
> IDEPCI_FLAG_ISA_PORTS = (1 << 0),
> - IDEPCI_FLAG_FORCE_PDC = (1 << 1),
> };
>
> typedef struct ide_pci_device_s {
> --- linux-2.6.17-rc1-mm1-full/drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_old.c.old 2006-04-07 00:52:13.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.17-rc1-mm1-full/drivers/ide/pci/pdc202xx_old.c 2006-04-07 00:52:19.000000000 +0200
> @@ -798,7 +798,6 @@
> .autodma = AUTODMA,
> .bootable = OFF_BOARD,
> .extra = 48,
> - .flags = IDEPCI_FLAG_FORCE_PDC,
> },{ /* 2 */
> .name = "PDC20263",
> .init_setup = init_setup_pdc202ata4,
> @@ -819,7 +818,6 @@
> .autodma = AUTODMA,
> .bootable = OFF_BOARD,
> .extra = 48,
> - .flags = IDEPCI_FLAG_FORCE_PDC,
> },{ /* 4 */
> .name = "PDC20267",
> .init_setup = init_setup_pdc202xx,
> --- linux-2.6.17-rc1-mm1-full/drivers/ide/setup-pci.c.old 2006-04-07 00:52:27.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.17-rc1-mm1-full/drivers/ide/setup-pci.c 2006-04-07 00:54:28.000000000 +0200
> @@ -580,7 +580,6 @@
> int port;
> int at_least_one_hwif_enabled = 0;
> ide_hwif_t *hwif, *mate = NULL;
> - static int secondpdc = 0;
> u8 tmp;
>
> index->all = 0xf0f0;
> @@ -592,21 +591,9 @@
> for (port = 0; port <= 1; ++port) {
> ide_pci_enablebit_t *e = &(d->enablebits[port]);
>
> - /*
> - * If this is a Promise FakeRaid controller,
> - * the 2nd controller will be marked as
> - * disabled while it is actually there and enabled
> - * by the bios for raid purposes.
> - * Skip the normal "is it enabled" test for those.
> - */
> - if ((d->flags & IDEPCI_FLAG_FORCE_PDC) &&
> - (secondpdc++==1) && (port==1))
> - goto controller_ok;
> -
> if (e->reg && (pci_read_config_byte(dev, e->reg, &tmp) ||
> (tmp & e->mask) != e->val))
> continue; /* port not enabled */
> -controller_ok:
>
> if (d->channels <= port)
> break;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
