* Bill Huey <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>> You should consider for a moment to allow for the binding of a
> > >>> thread to a CPU to determine the behavior of a SCHED_FIFO class task
> > >>> instead of creating a new run category. [...]
> >
> > with the observation that 1) binding is already possible [so your
> > suggestion is apparently knocking on open doors] 2) binding is a
> > separate mechanism (not adequate for all workloads) and it is thus
> > orthogonal to what i'm trying to achieve with the "RT overload" stuff.
> > Really simple and straightforward observations i think.
> First thing's first, SCHED_FIFO_GLOBAL for what you want in the main
> line is the same thing as SCHED_FIFO in -rt, right ?
yes.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
