On Thursday 06 April 2006 13:40, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Con Kolivas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 April 2006 12:55, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > > On Thursday 06 April 2006 12:43, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > Con Kolivas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > It is possible with a low enough lowmem_reserve ratio to make
> > > > > zone_watermark_ok fail repeatedly if the lower_zone is small
> > > > > enough.
> > > >
> > > > Is that actually a problem?
> > >
> > > Every single call to get_page_from_freelist will call on zone reclaim.
> > > It seems a problem to me if every call to __alloc_pages will do that?
> >
> > every call to __alloc_pages of that zone I mean
>
> One would need to check with the NUMA guys. zone_reclaim() has a
> (lame-looking) timer in there to prevent it from doing too much work.
>
> That, or I'm missing something. This problem wasn't particularly well
> described, sorry.
Ah ok. This all came about because I'm trying to honour the lowmem_reserve
better in swap_prefetch at Nick's request. It's hard to honour a watermark
that on some configurations is never reached.
Cheers,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
