On Thursday 06 April 2006 14:10, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 09:15 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 April 2006 03:38, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > - if (!rt_task(next) && interactive_sleep(next->sleep_type)) {
> > > + if (!TASK_INTERACTIVE(next) && interactive_sleep(next->sleep_type)) {
> >
> > You can't remove that rt_task check from there can you? We shouldn't ever
> > requeue a rt task.
>
> RT tasks are always interactive aren't they? (I'll check)
No, they're always equal to their static_prio. This rt_task check was added
originally because it was found to inappropriately be requeueing SCHED_FIFO
tasks.
Cheers,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]