Re: [patch 1/1] sys_sync_file_range()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Luck, Tony" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] sys_sync_file_range()
From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 14:03:31 -0700
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060313)

Luck, Tony wrote:
> Is it too late to fix __NR_sys_kexec_load (since it is out in the
> wild now?)

It's not too late IMO.  The only real users are the libcs.  And in fact,
I'm already checking for __NR_sync_file_range and not the sys_ variant.
 Andrew, please change it.

-- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

References:
- Re: [patch 1/1] sys_sync_file_range()
  - From: "Luck, Tony" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: CSCAN I/O scheduler for 2.6.10 kernel
Next by Date: Re: 2.6.17-rc1-mm1: mlockall() regression on x86_64
Previous by thread: Re: [patch 1/1] sys_sync_file_range()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Fix console utf8 composing (F) (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux