"Luck, Tony" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 11:41:11PM -0800, [email protected] wrote:
> > @@ -318,8 +318,9 @@
> > #define __NR_unshare 310
> > #define __NR_set_robust_list 311
> > #define __NR_get_robust_list 312
> > +#define __NR_sys_sync_file_range 313
>
> What's up with the __NR_sys_yada_yada?
brainfart. sync_file_range() and splice() will get fixed once Linus
resurfaces.
> Except for recent entries (kexec,
> splice, and now sync_file_range) all of the other names in here have
> dropped the "sys_".
>
> Is it too late to fix __NR_sys_kexec_load (since it is out in the
> wild now?)
It only affects users of the _syscallN macros in unistd.h. I don't expect
that fixing kexec will break much.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
