Re: lkml traffic (was:: [PATCH] unify PFN_* macros)

On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 02:12:23PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

> I work hard to ensure that all the right people are cc'ed on all the
> relevant patches.
> 
> Except for this one, which I phuk tup.  Sorry.

Well, few people make an as good job at drinking from the fire hose
as you do ;-)

  Ralf
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [PATCH] unify PFN_* macros
  - From: Ralf Baechle <[email protected]>
- lkml traffic (was:: [PATCH] unify PFN_* macros)
  - From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>
- Re: lkml traffic (was:: [PATCH] unify PFN_* macros)
  - From: Ralf Baechle <[email protected]>
- Re: lkml traffic (was:: [PATCH] unify PFN_* macros)
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] crypto: fix unaligned access in khazad module
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] sched: smpnice work around for active_load_balance()
Previous by thread: Re: lkml traffic (was:: [PATCH] unify PFN_* macros)
Next by thread: Re: lkml traffic (was:: [PATCH] unify PFN_* macros)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]