Re: lkml traffic (was:: [PATCH] unify PFN_* macros)

On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 08:39:40AM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:

> On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 13:49:16 +0100 Ralf Baechle wrote:
> 
> > How about posting such stuff to linux-arch?  No sane person follows l-k.
> 
> Can we do anything about lkml?  It "doesn't scale."

Not terribly much other than carefully choosing the right addresses of
people and lists to post to.  The only thing that's worse than too much
email is no email ...

  Ralf
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: lkml traffic (was:: [PATCH] unify PFN_* macros)
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: lkml traffic (was:: [PATCH] unify PFN_* macros)
  - From: Vadim Lobanov <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: [PATCH] unify PFN_* macros
  - From: Ralf Baechle <[email protected]>
- lkml traffic (was:: [PATCH] unify PFN_* macros)
  - From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] sched: smpnice work around for active_load_balance()
Next by Date: [patch 1/9] s390: Update default configuration.
Previous by thread: lkml traffic (was:: [PATCH] unify PFN_* macros)
Next by thread: Re: lkml traffic (was:: [PATCH] unify PFN_* macros)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]