Re: scheduler starvation resistance patches for 2.6.16

On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 06:35:25AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> Knowing that not everybody runs the latest/greatest mm kernels, I've
> adapted my scheduler starvation resistance tree to virgin 2.6.16.  Those
> interested will find seven patches in the attached tarball.
> 
> Test feedback much appreciated.

Thanks Mike.

It will be easier to test, and I'll try to convince some people around
me to give it a try. Do you expect the exact same behaviour as in -mm ?

Regards,
Willy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: scheduler starvation resistance patches for 2.6.16
    • From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>

• References:
  • scheduler starvation resistance patches for 2.6.16
    • From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: OOM kills if swappiness set to 0, swap storms otherwise
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] sched: prevent high load weight tasks suppressing balancing
• Previous by thread: scheduler starvation resistance patches for 2.6.16
• Next by thread: Re: scheduler starvation resistance patches for 2.6.16
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]