Re: OOM kills if swappiness set to 0, swap storms otherwise

On Monday 27 March 2006 22:59, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I'd tentatively say that your options are to put up
> with the swapping or find a new mail client.

I tried mem=512m , swapoff -a and swappiness=0 and all works fine for me on 
x86. I use Evolution and Firefox's KDE counterparts - in addition to that 
Amarok, Kopete and Akregator fit in too.

Lee - Perhaps you are running fat 64 bit code?

Parag
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: OOM kills if swappiness set to 0, swap storms otherwise
  - From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>

References:
- OOM kills if swappiness set to 0, swap storms otherwise
  - From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: OOM kills if swappiness set to 0, swap storms otherwise
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: OOM kills if swappiness set to 0, swap storms otherwise
Next by Date: Re: scheduler starvation resistance patches for 2.6.16
Previous by thread: Re: OOM kills if swappiness set to 0, swap storms otherwise
Next by thread: Re: OOM kills if swappiness set to 0, swap storms otherwise
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]