Re: OOM kills if swappiness set to 0, swap storms otherwise

On Monday 27 March 2006 22:59, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I'd tentatively say that your options are to put up
> with the swapping or find a new mail client.

I tried mem=512m , swapoff -a and swappiness=0 and all works fine for me on 
x86. I use Evolution and Firefox's KDE counterparts - in addition to that 
Amarok, Kopete and Akregator fit in too.

Lee - Perhaps you are running fat 64 bit code?

Parag
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: OOM kills if swappiness set to 0, swap storms otherwise
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>

• References:
  • OOM kills if swappiness set to 0, swap storms otherwise
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: OOM kills if swappiness set to 0, swap storms otherwise
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: OOM kills if swappiness set to 0, swap storms otherwise
• Next by Date: Re: scheduler starvation resistance patches for 2.6.16
• Previous by thread: Re: OOM kills if swappiness set to 0, swap storms otherwise
• Next by thread: Re: OOM kills if swappiness set to 0, swap storms otherwise
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]