"David S. Miller" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 03:47:44 -0800
>
> > I think it'd be cleanest to require that the arch do that -
> > fixup_cpu_present_map() looks like a bit of a hack.
>
> Indeed it does. I'm planning on doing someting like this
> for sparc64:
Fair enough. fixup_cpu_present_map() is an elaborate no-op now. I'll nuke
it and will send a heads-up to the arch maintainers.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
