Hi Greg, Christpher,
> > I don't think C99 initializers are needed here, the structure is pretty
> > simple and is also defined in the same file, a few lines above all its
> > instance declarations. So I am indeed asking for a patch w/o macros and
> > w/o C99 structure initializers, unless someone objects.
>
> You should use structure initializers whereever possible, as it makes
> future changes much easier and safer (reorder the fields and things
> don't break in odd ways.) So I would encourage this kind of change.
Oh well, if Greg says so...
Christopher, can you please respin a patch with C99 initializers, which
would look a bit better than your original one? I'd suggest a single,
straightforward macro (no needless underscores please):
#define LINEOP(val, port, inverted) \
{ .val = (val), .port = (port), .inverted = (inverted) }
Hopefully this will keep all lines within a reasonable length and won't
hurt the readability too much.
Also, I just noticed in your original patch: please preserve the comma
at the end of the last line of struct declarations. It's not needed,
sure, but it makes later changes easier.
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]