On 3/24/06, Andreas Mohr <[email protected]> wrote:
> + loops += bclock;
[...]
> - } while ((now-bclock) < loops);
> + } while (now < loops);
Erm, aren't you introducing an overflow problem here?
if loops is 2^32-1, bclock is 1, the old version would execute the
proper number of times, the new one will blow out in one tick.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
