Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in thee820 table

On Friday 24 March 2006 16:42, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > In theory they should be the same. What do you think is different?
> 
> in practice the x86-64 version returns "success" if there is one byte in the entire
> memory range that complies with the requested type, even if the rest of the range is
> of another type. 

I would consider that a bug. Please send fix.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in thee820 table
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in the e820 table
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in thee820 table
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in thee820 table
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Connector: Filesystem Events Connector v3
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in thee820 table
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in thee820 table
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in thee820 table
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]