Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in thee820 table

On Friday 24 March 2006 16:42, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > In theory they should be the same. What do you think is different?
> 
> in practice the x86-64 version returns "success" if there is one byte in the entire
> memory range that complies with the requested type, even if the rest of the range is
> of another type. 

I would consider that a bug. Please send fix.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in thee820 table
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

References:
- [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in the e820 table
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in thee820 table
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in thee820 table
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Connector: Filesystem Events Connector v3
Next by Date: Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in thee820 table
Previous by thread: Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in thee820 table
Next by thread: Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in thee820 table
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]