Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in the e820 table

Andi Kleen wrote:

I added the patch to my patchkit now.

thanks

I also have an older patch (needs a bit
more cleanup) that checks for all busses if they are reachable using MCFG
Still needs some more work and interaction check with PCI hotplug though.

yes more advanced tests are going to be useful; at least this one was simple and catches
a large portion of the problem cases.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in the e820 table
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
- Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in the e820 table
  - From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
- Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in the e820 table
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
- Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in the e820 table
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
- Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in the e820 table
  - From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 35/35] Add Xen virtual block device driver.
Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 35/35] Add Xen virtual block device driver.
Previous by thread: Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in the e820 table
Next by thread: Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in the e820 table
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]