Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in the e820 table

> That is e820_mapped(address, address+size, E820_RESERVED)
> 
> And not having a size is definitely wrong on i386 too.

s/wrong/not selective enough/

and e820_mapped doesn't check this either anyway, at least not the way
you imply it does.

I'll do a new patch using this for x86_64 though, no need to make a
second function like this.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in the e820 table
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

References:
- [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in the e820 table
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in the e820 table
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [Patch] unused label in drivers/block/cciss.c
Next by Date: Re: Libata PATA for 2.6.16
Previous by thread: Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in the e820 table
Next by thread: Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in the e820 table
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]