Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in the e820 table

> That is e820_mapped(address, address+size, E820_RESERVED)
> 
> And not having a size is definitely wrong on i386 too.

s/wrong/not selective enough/

and e820_mapped doesn't check this either anyway, at least not the way
you imply it does.

I'll do a new patch using this for x86_64 though, no need to make a
second function like this.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in the e820 table
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in the e820 table
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in the e820 table
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [Patch] unused label in drivers/block/cciss.c
• Next by Date: Re: Libata PATA for 2.6.16
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in the e820 table
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in the e820 table
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]