Re: [2.6.16-mm1 patch] throttling tree patches

[Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>]

patch 2/6

This patch just fixes a bug waiting for a place to happen.  If anyone
ever decides to use TASK_NONINTERACTIVE along with TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE,
bad things will happen.

Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>

--- linux-2.6.16-mm1/kernel/sched.c-1.timewarp	2006-03-23 15:04:42.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.16-mm1/kernel/sched.c	2006-03-23 15:07:08.000000000 +0100
@@ -1418,7 +1418,7 @@
 
 out_activate:
 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
-	if (old_state == TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) {
+	if (old_state & TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) {
 		rq->nr_uninterruptible--;
 		/*
 		 * Tasks on involuntary sleep don't earn
@@ -3125,7 +3125,7 @@
 				unlikely(signal_pending(prev))))
 			prev->state = TASK_RUNNING;
 		else {
-			if (prev->state == TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
+			if (prev->state & TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
 				rq->nr_uninterruptible++;
 			deactivate_task(prev, rq);
 		}


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/