Re: Two comments on the H.323 conntrack/NAT helper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick McHardy" <[email protected]>
To: "Adrian Bunk" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; "Jing Min Zhao" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: Two comments on the H.323 conntrack/NAT helper


[The hotmail address of the author doesn't work, CCed sourceforge-address]

Adrian Bunk wrote:
Two comments on the H.323 conntrack/NAT helper:
- the function prototypes in ip_nat_helper_h323.c are _ugly_,
  please move them to a header file

Their ugliness is because of the current API, which cleaned up
quite a lot of the surrounding code, but requires this ugliness
from each helper. I would like to keep them visible as a reminder
that a cleaner solution is wanted, but moving them to header
files certainly sound like a good idea to eliminate the risk
of prototype conflicts. But please do this for all helpers
at once.

- is there a reason for not using EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL?

I would prefer that too.



Sure, I'll do that.

Thanks

Jing Min Zhao -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux