Two comments on the H.323 conntrack/NAT helper

Two comments on the H.323 conntrack/NAT helper:
- the function prototypes in ip_nat_helper_h323.c are _ugly_,
  please move them to a header file
- is there a reason for not using EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL?

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Two comments on the H.323 conntrack/NAT helper
  - From: "Jing Min Zhao" <[email protected]>
- Re: Two comments on the H.323 conntrack/NAT helper
  - From: Patrick McHardy <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [RFC: 2.6 patch] ip_conntrack_helper_h323.c: make get_h245_addr() static
Next by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] ip_conntrack_helper_h323.c: EXPORT_SYMBOL'ed functions shouldn't be static
Previous by thread: [RFC: 2.6 patch] ip_conntrack_helper_h323.c: make get_h245_addr() static
Next by thread: Re: Two comments on the H.323 conntrack/NAT helper
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]