Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 10:10 -0600, K.R. Foley wrote:
>
>> Found something interesting. Having Wakeup latency timing turned on
>> makes a HUGE difference. I turned it off and recompiled and now I am
>> seeing numbers back in line with what I expected from 2.6.16-rt4. Sorry,
>> but I had no idea it would make that much difference. I don't have a
>> complete run yet, but I have seen enough to know that I am not seeing
>> tons of missed interrupts and the highest reported latency thus far is
>> 61 usec.
>
> Just Wakeup latency timing , and not latency tracing ?
>
> Daniel
>
>
Unfortunately I can't say for sure because I don't remember turning it
off, but looking at the log it appears as though latency tracing was
turned on
--
kr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
