Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * K.R. Foley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I haven't had a chance to look into it yet but this combination brings
>> with it a significant latency regression, at least as measured by the
>> rtc histogram stuff.
>
> can you also measure it via rtc_wakeup, a'ka:
>
> chrt -f -p 98 `pidof 'IRQ 8'`
> ./rtc_wakeup -f 8192 -t 100000
>
> ? I have just tried it, and -rt4 looks pretty good on the latency front
> (with all debugging disabled).
>
> Ingo
>
Sorry I have been onsite and completely buried today. Am running an
initial test on both UP and SMP now with 2.6.16-rt1. UP doesn't look bad
at all. SMP on the other hand doesn't look so good. I will give -rt4 a
spin when these are done.
--
kr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
