[RFC, PATCH] avoid some atomics in open()/close() for monothreaded processes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Goal : Avoid some locking/unlocking 'struct files_struct'->file_lock for mono threaded processes.

We define files_multithreaded() function .

static inline int files_multithreaded(const struct files_struct *files)
{
       return sizeof(files->file_lock) > 0 && atomic_read(&files->count) > 1;
}

On plain UP kernel (not preemptable nor spinlock debug), this function is a const 0, so that gcc can wipe out some code.

On preemptible or SMP, or spinlock debug kernels, the result is true only if the ref count is greater than 1 (multi threaded process or /proc/{pid}/fd is under investigation by another task)

This patch increases kernel size but pros are worth the cons, as said Linus himself, we should increase performance of mono-threaded tasks....

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
--- a/include/linux/file.h	2006-03-22 06:23:02.000000000 +0100
+++ b/include/linux/file.h	2006-03-22 07:11:08.000000000 +0100
@@ -42,6 +42,11 @@
 	spinlock_t file_lock;     /* Protects concurrent writers.  Nests inside tsk->alloc_lock */
 };
 
+static inline int files_multithreaded(const struct files_struct *files)
+{
+	return sizeof(files->file_lock) > 0 && atomic_read(&files->count) > 1;
+}
+
 #define files_fdtable(files) (rcu_dereference((files)->fdt))
 
 extern void FASTCALL(__fput(struct file *));
--- a/fs/open.c.orig	2006-03-22 06:24:34.000000000 +0100
+++ b/fs/open.c	2006-03-22 06:30:54.000000000 +0100
@@ -1050,11 +1050,17 @@
 {
 	struct files_struct *files = current->files;
 	struct fdtable *fdt;
-	spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
+	int fl_locked = 0;
+
+	if (files_multithreaded(files)) {
+		spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
+		fl_locked = 1;
+	}
 	fdt = files_fdtable(files);
 	BUG_ON(fdt->fd[fd] != NULL);
 	rcu_assign_pointer(fdt->fd[fd], file);
-	spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
+	if (fl_locked)
+		spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
 }
 
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(fd_install);
@@ -1147,8 +1153,12 @@
 	struct file * filp;
 	struct files_struct *files = current->files;
 	struct fdtable *fdt;
+	int fl_locked = 0;
 
-	spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
+	if (files_multithreaded(files)) {
+		spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
+		fl_locked = 1;
+	}
 	fdt = files_fdtable(files);
 	if (fd >= fdt->max_fds)
 		goto out_unlock;
@@ -1158,11 +1168,13 @@
 	rcu_assign_pointer(fdt->fd[fd], NULL);
 	FD_CLR(fd, fdt->close_on_exec);
 	__put_unused_fd(files, fd);
-	spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
+	if (fl_locked)
+		spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
 	return filp_close(filp, files);
 
 out_unlock:
-	spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
+	if (fl_locked)
+		spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
 	return -EBADF;
 }
 

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux