Re: [PATCH] fix memory leak in mm/slab.c::alloc_kmemlist() (try #3)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Pekka, Andrew, Christoph & everyone else,


On Monday 20 March 2006 09:55, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> Hi Pekka,
> 
> On 3/19/06, Pekka Enberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 3/18/06, Jesper Juhl <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Currently the only caller of alloc_kmemlist() will BUG() if alloc_kmemlist()
> > > fails, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't clean up properly IMHO. Also, the
> > > caller (do_tune_cpucache()) could maybe be changed in the future to do
> > > something more clever than just BUG() and in that case we really shouldn't
> > > be leaking memory when we return -ENOMEM.
> >
> > Yeah, and BUG() can be no-op for embedded.
> >
> > On 3/18/06, Jesper Juhl <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > The patch has been compile and boot tested on x86, but since I'm not very
> > > intimate with the slab code I'd appreciate it if someone would take a close
> > > look on the changes before merging them.
> >
> > You probably didn't hit the error path on your x86 box. The patch
> > looks good to me for -mm although there's few comments below.
> >
> > > +/*
> > > +   If one or more allocations fail we need to undo all allocations done up to
> > > +   this point.
> > > +   Unfortunately this means yet another loop, but since this only happens on
> > > +   failure and frees up memory in a memory-tight situation, it's not too bad.
> > > + */
> >
> > The formatting of this comment looks strange.
> >
> > > +       for_each_online_node(node) {
> > > +               if (count <= 0)
> > > +                       break;
> > > +               if (cachep->nodelists[node]) {
> >
> > Would probably make sense to extract the above expression into local
> > variable to reduce kernel text size.
> >
> > > +                       kfree(cachep->nodelists[node]->shared);
> > > +                       free_alien_cache(cachep->nodelists[node]->alien);
> > > +                       kfree(cachep->nodelists[node]);
> > > +                       cachep->nodelists[node] = NULL;
> > > +               }
> > > +               count--;
> > > +       }
> > > +       return -ENOMEM;
> >
> 
> Thank you very much for your feedback.
> 
> I'll create an updated patch with the changes you suggest. They make
> perfect sense.
> 

Here's the latest version of my patch to fix the mem leak in alloc_kmemlist().
It should address Pekkas's comments.

Andrew: Do you think this could go into -mm and get some field testing, so 
perhaps it has a chance of making 2.6.17?


Fix memory leak in mm/slab.c::alloc_kmemlist().
If one allocation fails we have to roll-back all allocations made up to the 
point of failure.


Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
---

 mm/slab.c |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm2-orig/mm/slab.c	2006-03-18 16:55:55.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm2/mm/slab.c	2006-03-21 22:33:45.000000000 +0100
@@ -3399,12 +3399,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kmem_cache_name);
 static int alloc_kmemlist(struct kmem_cache *cachep)
 {
 	int node;
+	int count = -1;
 	struct kmem_list3 *l3;
-	int err = 0;
+	struct array_cache *new;
+	struct array_cache **new_alien;
 
 	for_each_online_node(node) {
-		struct array_cache *nc = NULL, *new;
-		struct array_cache **new_alien = NULL;
+		struct array_cache *nc = NULL;
+
+		new = NULL;
+		new_alien = NULL;
+		count++;
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
 		new_alien = alloc_alien_cache(node, cachep->limit);
 		if (!new_alien)
@@ -3447,10 +3452,29 @@ static int alloc_kmemlist(struct kmem_ca
 					cachep->batchcount + cachep->num;
 		cachep->nodelists[node] = l3;
 	}
-	return err;
+	return 0;
+/**
+ * If one or more allocations fail we need to undo all allocations done up to
+ * this point. Unfortunately this means yet another loop, but since this only
+ * happens on failure and frees up memory in a memory-tight situation, it's
+ * not too bad.
+ */
 fail:
-	err = -ENOMEM;
-	return err;
+	kfree(new);
+	free_alien_cache(new_alien);
+	for_each_online_node(node) {
+		if (count <= 0)
+			break;
+		l3 = cachep->nodelists[node];
+		if (l3) {
+			kfree(l3->shared);
+			free_alien_cache(l3->alien);
+			kfree(l3);
+			cachep->nodelists[node] = NULL;
+		}
+		count--;
+	}
+	return -ENOMEM;
 }
 
 struct ccupdate_struct {




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux