On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 12:18 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > great work by Mike! One detail: i'd like there to be just one default > throttling value, i.e. no grace_g tunables [so that we have just one > default scheduler behavior]. Is the default grace_g[12] setting good > enough for your workload? I can make the knobs compile time so we don't see random behavior reports, but I don't think they can be totally eliminated. Would that be sufficient? If so, the numbers as delivered should be fine for desktop boxen I think. People who are building custom kernels can bend to fit as always. -Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: interactive task starvation
- From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
- Re: interactive task starvation
- References:
- Re: [ck] Re: [PATCH] mm: yield during swap prefetching
- From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] Re: [PATCH] mm: yield during swap prefetching
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- interactive task starvation
- From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
- Re: interactive task starvation
- From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
- Re: interactive task starvation
- From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
- Re: interactive task starvation
- From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
- Re: interactive task starvation
- From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
- Re: interactive task starvation
- From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
- Re: interactive task starvation
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: interactive task starvation
- From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
- Re: interactive task starvation
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] Re: [PATCH] mm: yield during swap prefetching
- Prev by Date: Re: gettimeofday order of magnitude slower with pmtimer, which is default
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- Previous by thread: Re: interactive task starvation
- Next by thread: Re: interactive task starvation
- Index(es):
 |