* Con Kolivas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > We do have SCHED_BATCH but even that doesn't really have the desired
> > effect. I know how much yield sucks and I actually want it to suck as much
> > as yield does.
>
> Thinking some more on this I wonder if SCHED_BATCH isn't a strong
> enough scheduling hint if it's not suitable for such an application.
> Ingo do you think we could make SCHED_BATCH tasks always wake up on
> the expired array?
yep, i think that's a good idea. In the worst case the starvation
timeout should kick in.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
