On 3/20/06, Jeff Dike <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 01:17:59PM -0300, Matheus Izvekov wrote:
> > If a filesystem is nodev, then what would you fsck? Am i missing something?
>
> There's a UML filesystem for which the nodev-implies-no-fsck behavior
> is inconvenient. It stores its files as files on the host, where the
> file metadata is stored separately from the file data. If the two
> fall out of sync after a crash, we need to fsck it. In this case,
> fsck would do a hostfs mount of the data and metadata (where the files
> are available as they exist on the host) and fix things up.
>
> So, in this case, the thing being fscked is a directory hierarchy on
> the host.
>
> Jeff
>
I see, i didnt know about this. But then pam_mount would need to do
special treatment for this. I imagine it has been only coded to work
in the case where there is a device to pass to fsck as a parameter.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
