Linus Torvalds wrote: > Yes. Quick raising of hands: is there anybody out there that expects to > use unshare(CLONE_VM) right now? One of the reasons it was integrated was > that I thought glibc wanted it for distros. Is disabling the CLONE_VM > unsharing going to impact that? I'm not planning to use unshare(CLONE_VM). It's not needed for any functionality planned so far. What we (as in Red Hat) need unshare() for now is the filesystem side. -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- References:
- [PATCH] unshare: Cleanup up the sys_unshare interface before we are committed.
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- [PATCH] unshare: Use rcu_assign_pointer when setting sighand
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH] unshare: Use rcu_assign_pointer when setting sighand
- From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] unshare: Use rcu_assign_pointer when setting sighand
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] unshare: Use rcu_assign_pointer when setting sighand
- From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] unshare: Use rcu_assign_pointer when setting sighand
- From: Janak Desai <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] unshare: Use rcu_assign_pointer when setting sighand
- From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] for 2.6.16, disable unshare_vm()
- From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] for 2.6.16, disable unshare_vm()
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] unshare: Cleanup up the sys_unshare interface before we are committed.
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.16-rcX - no more sound with ALSA snd-hda-intel / Sigmatel
- Next by Date: [-mm patch] drivers/edac/e752x_edac.c: make sysbus_message static
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] for 2.6.16, disable unshare_vm()
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] for 2.6.16, disable unshare_vm()
- Index(es):
 |