Re: [PATCH] unshare: Use rcu_assign_pointer when setting sighand

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Morton wrote:

Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> wrote:
"Eric W. Biederman" wrote:
@@ -1573,7 +1573,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_unshare(unsigned lon

               if (new_sigh) {
                       sigh = current->sighand;
-                       current->sighand = new_sigh;
+                       rcu_assign_pointer(current->sighand, new_sigh);
                       new_sigh = sigh;
               }
Isn't it better to just replace this code with
'BUG_ON(new_sigh != NULL)' ?

It is never executed, but totally broken, afaics.
task_lock() has nothing to do with ->sighand changing.


/*
* Unsharing of sighand for tasks created with CLONE_SIGHAND is not
* supported yet
*/
static int unshare_sighand(unsigned long unshare_flags, struct sighand_struct **new_sighp)

It's all just a place-holder at present.

If we don't plan on ever supporting unshare(CLONE_SIGHAND) we should take
that code out and make it return EINVAL.  Right now.

And because we don't presently support CLONE_SIGHAND we should return
EINVAL if it's set.  Right now.
unshare does return EINVAL if signal handler unsharing is attempted by a
process that is currently sharing its signal handler with another process. However,
because of the interaction between signal handlers and vm, CLONE_SIGHAND
is set anytime vm unsharing is attempted. That is, if you are trying to unshare vm, you must unshare signal handlers. But if they are not being shared in the
first place, there is no need to prevent unsharing of vm.

Therefore, unshare returns EINVAL if unsharing of signal handlers and/or vm
is attempted by a process that is sharing its signal handler.

And we should change sys_unshare() to reject not-understood flags.  Right
now.
Eric just posted a patch to do this.

If we don't do these things we'll silently break 2.6.16-back-compatibility
of applications which are coded for future kernels.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux