Re: [PATCH] for_each_possible_cpu [1/19] defines for_each_possible_cpu

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 19:40:06 -0800
Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sometimes.  Sometimes it's valid though - allocating (small amounts of)
> per-cpu storage, summing up per-cpu counters (poorly), etc.
> 
> >  -#define for_each_cpu(cpu)	  for_each_cpu_mask((cpu), cpu_possible_map)
> >  +#define for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)  for_each_cpu_mask((cpu), cpu_possible_map)
> 
> Nope, I'll change this to
> 
> #define for_each_cpu(cpu)	  for_each_cpu_mask((cpu), cpu_possible_map)
> #define for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)  for_each_cpu_mask((cpu), cpu_possible_map)
> 

Okay..It looks I was too aggressive :(
-- Kame
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] for_each_possible_cpu [1/19] defines for_each_possible_cpu
    • From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] for_each_possible_cpu [1/19] defines for_each_possible_cpu
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Bug in 2.6.16-rc6 RAID size reporting
• Next by Date: Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] for_each_possible_cpu [1/19] defines for_each_possible_cpu
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] for_each_possible_cpu [1/19] defines for_each_possible_cpu
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]