Re: [2.6 patch] net/decnet/dn_route.c: fix inconsequent NULL checking

From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 00:02:33 +0100

> The Coverity checker noted this inconsequent NULL checking in
> dnrt_drop().
> 
> Since all callers ensure that NULL isn't passed, we can simply remove 
> the check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

Applied, thanks Adrian.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [2.6 patch] net/decnet/dn_route.c: fix inconsequent NULL checking
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - Calgary specific bits
• Next by Date: Re: What is ptrace flag PT_TRACESYSGOOD for?
• Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] net/decnet/dn_route.c: fix inconsequent NULL checking
• Next by thread: [2.6 patch] net/sunrpc/clnt.c: fix a NULL pointer dereference
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]